Monday, November 17, 2014


Bought is a terrific new documentary about the health dangers of vaccines, prescription drugs and genetically modified foods. The film is hosted by outspoken Evanston, Illinois, physician Toni Bark, who’s treated in her own medical practice children who’ve been injured by vaccines. Some ME patients have had their own disease brought on by vaccination, particularly hepatitis B.

One of the many frightening things that I learned from the film is that some GMO foods have, among other alarming facts, the ability to destroy gut bacteria. Since most of the immune system is in the gut, disruption of gut flora may have problematic health consequences. (Basically, in a twist on the 1970s commercial for Chiffon margarine, it's not nice to fool Mother Nature.)

As the title of the film makes crystal clear, money, greed, corruption and sociopathy rule in big pharma, whereas people’s health is an afterthought—if that. And since CDC essentially works for pharma, and physicians trust CDC to give them accurate information, physicians and the public are comforted, the physicians into believing they're doing the right thing, and the public into believing that it's safe. But the film argues that in fact people, particularly children, have become the canaries in the coal mine.  

The good news is that people are starting to wake up to the fact that they’ve got to fight for their own health and the health of their children. Bought documents how advocates in Connecticut fought for GMO labeling on food—GMO manufacturers have been campaigning vigorously against it—and in 2013, the state became the first to pass a bill to require companies to label products that contain GMOs.

The film is available to stream for $4.95 until November 21 at You can watch the trailer here:

Monday, November 3, 2014

Medical Marijuana

Tomorrow is Election Day here in Pennsylvania, and I’ll be doing my part to oust current Republican Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett out of office for, among other things, his not-over-my-dead-body’s approach to the legalization of medical marijuana.  After pressure was applied on Corbett last spring—80 percent of Pennsylvanians support legalized medical marijuana—he grudgingly partially reversed his opinion on the subject—but only for severe childhood epilepsy.

A friend of mine’s 16-year-old is daughter is plagued with severe epilepsy—and anticonvulsant meds and the Johns Hopkins high-fat ketogenic diet haven’t worked: The young woman has tried multiple drugs and multiple combinations, and still she experiences multiple seizures daily.  Whether pot can reduce her seizures is anybody’s guess, but she should have the right to try it now and not wait for the grindingly slow wheels of Pennsylvania politics to make it possible.  How many more seizures will she have before medical marijuana is approved here?  

The marijuana that’s effective for seizures has little to no THC, the chemical that makes you high. Instead, marijuana with anti-seizure activity is high in another chemical called CBD, which doesn’t make you high but can control or eliminate seizures. Marijuana high in CBD can be taken orally as an oil. 

CBD is also great at reducing pain and helping sleep, so it’s not surprising that CBD also helps fibromyalgia, ME and Lyme patients.  Several ME patients have reported that marijuana helps diminish nerve, muscle and joint pain and improves sleep. Shouldn’t fibro, Lyme and ME patients, and other patient with other diseases have the right to medical marijuana as well, Governor Corbett?

The good news is he probably won’t be governor for long. Democratic candidate Tom Wolf, still leading in the polls, supports medical marijuana.  In a recent debate with Corbett, Wolf said:  “We need to legalize medical marijuana immediately. We need to work quickly on that. We need to decriminalize small amounts of marijuana. We put too many people in prison. We break up families and destroy too many lives.”

Amen to that. 

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Autism Study Redux

In a TV interview, Dr. Brian Hooker explains other problematic autism findings CDC tried to bury, according to CDC whistleblower Dr. William Thompson, and that includes thimerosal, at about 13:38.  He also mentions class-action suits.

What Lies Beneath

Age of Autism’s Dan Olmstead and Kent Heckenlively, among others, have been covering the developing story of a CDC autism study whose findings were allegedly altered. They reported that Dr. William W. Thompsonone of the authors of the 2004 CDC study that found no link between how early the MMR shot was administered and the development of autismdisclosed that he and others buried evidence about that study. In fact, according to a new study just published by Dr. Brian Hooker that was based on a reanalysis of the original data of the 2004 study, giving the MMR shot before 36 months increased the rate of autism in African American boys by a whopping 340 percent.

Provided the findings of Hooker’s study are correct, who at CDC and elsewhere in the government knew the authentic autism statistics in that study? Did the researcher or researchers act on their own, or were they ordered to change the findings? Were findings in other autism studies altered? Did Dr. Julie Gerberding, the head of CDC at the time (who now serves as the president of Merck’s vaccine division) know about the alleged tampering with the statistical analysis? Have any of the scientists who participated in the alleged tampering perjured themselves before Congress?

The story has yet to break on major networks and newspapers. CNN weighed in for about a minute, summoning, Dan Olmsted wrote, attorney Dorit Reiss to comment that even if the claims about the CDC study were correct, “which is doubtful, it would show that for most of the population MMR does not cause autism.” In what universe is that reassuring? Not surprisingly, CNN quickly yanked the clip from its lineup.

Add to the mix Congressman Bill Posey’s (R/Florida) disgust with what he calls CDC’s “incestuous” relationship with the vaccine makers. Will he help get to the bottom of this?

There’s a video hosted by Dr. Andrew Wakefield about the 2004 study and a petition to retract the study; click here to see both.