Ampligen: It's a NO

From the GlobeNewswire:

Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc.(NYSE MKT:HEB) (the "Company" or "Hemispherx"), announced that it received a Complete Response Letter from the US Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") declining to approve its new drug application ("NDA") for Ampligen® for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ("CFS"). The FDA said Hemispherx should conduct at least one additional clinical trial, complete various nonclinical studies and perform a number of data analyses.

In its Complete Response Letter ("CRL"), the FDA set forth the reasons for this action and provided recommendations to address certain of the outstanding issues. The Agency stated that the submitted data do not provide substantial evidence of efficacy of Ampligen® for the treatment of CFS and that the data do not provide sufficient information to determine whether the product is safe for use in CFS due to the limited size of the safety database and multiple discrepancies within the submitted data. 

In the two pivotal clinical studies that form the basis of approval for Ampligen®, Hemispherx believes that the primary efficacy endpoints were met and that they showed a statistically significant improvement (i.e., with a p-value of 0.05 or less). The FDA and Hemispherx do agree that in clinical study AMP-502, the primary endpoint was met (p=0.02). In clinical study AMP-516, the FDA's analysis resulted in a p-value of 0.10, while Hemispherx's calculation resulted in a p-value of <0 .="" nbsp="" p="">

Hemispherx plans to request an end-of-review conference with the FDA as a precursor to submitting a formal appeal to the Office of New Drugs in the FDA'sCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research regarding the Agency's decision. The purpose of the conference is to review all of the issues raised in the Agency's CRL as well as to discuss the corroborating data and experiences of clinicians and patients who have seen the benefits of Ampligen® therapy. 

Hemispherx has become aware that a prominent CFS advocate and long-time CFS sufferer, who has been on Ampligen® since 1999 through a treatment IND, began a hunger strike on January 30, 2013 to seek FDA approval of Ampligen®.  Hemispherx understands the frustration that there is still no FDA-approved treatment for CFS and the concern that patients may lose access to Ampligen® therapy. Out of concern for the health of the CFS community, Hemispherx has asked any hunger strikes be discontinued and that patients join in a collaborative effort between the FDA, Hemispherx, CFS clinicians and patient advocates to find a solution to this significant unmet medical need. 

In the past, the FDA has shown great willingness to work with stakeholders to find solutions for serious and life-threatening illnesses. Dr. Margaret Hamburg, Commissioner of the FDA has previously stated that, "FDA has an important role to play in shaping the future of medical breakthroughs by bringing stakeholders together to identify and overcome challenges." Hemispherx hopes that the FDA will view the Ampligen® end-of-review conference as an opportunity to involve patient advocacy, clinicians and researchers in a concentrated effort to do something for these patients over the near-term, including further evaluation of how new legislation, such as the recently enacted "FDASIA" statute, may have a role in finding a solution. The views of one internationally recognized researcher/clinician, Dr. Nancy Klimas, who has over 20 years' experience evaluating and treating CFS patients, can be found athttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130124183448.htm

DISCLOSURE NOTICE: The information in this press release and the article referenced therein includes certain "forward-looking" statements (explained below), including statements about the remaining steps, including the aforementioned end-of-review conference and appeals process, which the FDA may require and Hemispherx may take in further seeking FDA approval of the Ampligen® NDA for the treatment of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. The final results of these and other ongoing activities could vary materially from Hemispherx's expectations and could adversely affect the chances for approval of the Ampligen® NDA.  Any failure to satisfy the FDA's requirements could significantly delay, or preclude outright, approval of the Ampligen® NDA. 

About Hemispherx Biopharma

Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc. is an advanced specialty pharmaceutical company engaged in the manufacture and clinical development of new drug entities for treatment of seriously debilitating disorders. Hemispherx's flagship products include Alferon N Injection® (FDA approved for a category of sexually transmitted diseases) and the experimental therapeutics Ampligen® and Alferon® LDO. Because both Ampligen® and Alferon® LDO are experimental in nature, they are not designated safe and effective by a regulatory authority for general use and are legally available only through clinical trials with the referenced disorders. Ampligen® is an experimental RNA nucleic acid being developed for globally important debilitating diseases and disorders of the immune system including Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Hemispherx's platform technology includes components for potential treatment of various severely debilitating and life threatening diseases. Hemispherx has patents comprising its core intellectual property estate and a fully commercialized product (Alferon N Injection®). The Company wholly owns and exclusively operates a GMP certified manufacturing facility in the United States for commercial products. For more information please visitwww.hemispherx.net.

Forward-Looking Statements

To the extent that statements in this press release are not strictly historical, all such statements are forward-looking, and are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as "believes," "plans," "anticipates," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are based on the company's current beliefs and expectations and represent the Company's judgment as of the date of this release. The inclusion of forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by Hemispherx that any of its plans will be achieved, including its intent to pursue the end-of-review conference and appeals process. These forward-looking statements are neither promises nor guarantees of future performance, and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond Hemispherx's control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in these forward-looking statements. Examples of such risks and uncertainties include those set forth in the Disclosure Notice, above, as well as the risks described in Hemispherx's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the most recent reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K and Hemispherx's beliefs that the Ampligen® NDA may be covered by the new provisions of the FDASIA statute, which are subject to FDA interpretation and implementation, or that such provisions, if applicable, will be helpful with regard to obtaining FDA approval of the Ampligen® NDA. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof, and Hemispherx undertakes no obligation to update or revise the information contained in this press release, whether as a result of new information, future events or circumstances or otherwise revise or update this release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof.

Hamlet Without Hamlet

Patient advocate Bob Miller, who's on the experimental drug Ampligen, has been urging FDA to approve the medication for ME by going on a hunger strike.  He's been fasting since January 29th: six days.  Healthy people fasting for six days would be weak. But someone with ME?

Last month another patient advocate suggested to me that ME patients or their loved ones go on such a strike.  I shook my head and gave a gallows-humor kind of laugh.  I thought it cruel to ask such sick patients to stop eating, more unthinkable than doing Hamlet without Hamlet.  And as for loved ones who'd lend that kind of support, well, I don't know about you, but I don't know too many people who believe in ME, let alone be willing to fast for someone with the disease.

But maybe it doesn't always take a lot of people to effect real change.

Ironically, perhaps his being on Ampligen has given Bob Miller enough strength for a hunger strike.  Or maybe Bob Miller's just so fed up with the pathetic state of affairs with ME that he brought out the big guns.  With no drugs except tottering Ampligen and little useful research, it's drier than the Sahara out there.  Miller's one-man hunger strike is, thankfully, garnering a lot of attention, including that of a well-known early AIDS activist, Cleve Jones.

Jones's character appeared in Gus Van Sant's fantastic movie Milk, about the slain politician and gay activist Harvey Milk. In this clip, Milk (played by Sean Penn), enlists Jones (Emile Hirsch) to join the revolution for gay rights. For a grim laugh, try substituting "CDC" for "Franco" and "ME people" for "gay people."


Here's the press release about Bob Miller's hunger strike:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Bob Miller and Courtney Miller
Tel: 703-554-5575 
Email: bobmiller42@msn.com

PATIENT ON HUNGER STRIKE GAINING ATTENTION 

Well-known Journalist and Long-time AIDS Activist Offer Support 

Calling attention to the plight of one million disabled Americans suffering with ME/CFS (myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome), patient Robert Miller continues his hunger strike -- and it is gaining attention from a well-known journalist and a long-time HIV/AIDS activist, as well as an NBC affiliate in Nevada.

These new developments come as we wait for the Food and Drug Administration's decision, due Monday, Feb 4, 2013, on whether or not it will approve Ampligen, the first medication ever considered by the FDA for ME/CFS. This illness disables one million Americans, leaving many bedridden, homebound and suffering for decades on end with little hope for recovery and little help from the U.S. government, which dedicates a mere $6 million dollars each year to ME/CFS research.

First, well-known HIV/AIDS activist, Cleve Jones, founder of the AIDS quilt project, came out in support of ME/CFS patient Robert Miller's hunger strike. Mr. Jones writes: “My friend is on a hunger strike to get the first medicine approved for his severe case of chronic fatigue syndrome. FDA is likely to deny the drug this weekend. We know we wouldn’t be where we are today if some of us hadn’t protested inaction by federal agencies on AIDS treatments. Email: kathleen.sebelius@hhs.gov  Urge FDA to approve Ampligen, so all CFS patients can have just one treatment option. CFS patients suffer without any treatments, and I can remember those days in my life. I urge Secretary Sebelius to approve Ampligen for CFS and apply what we learned with HIV about getting treatments to patients like every minute counts.”

Secondly, long-time Washington DC journalist, Llewellyn King, commented on ME/CFS sufferer Robert Miller's hunger strike on his PBS television program, "White House Chronicle." It is airing this weekend on PBS stations in Washington --Sunday, Feb. 3 at 9 a.m. on WETA, Channel 26; Sunday at 11:30 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. on WHUT, Channel 32. It will air throughout the week on some 200 PBS and public, educational and governmental cable TV stations and worldwide on Voice of America Television. An audio version of the episode will air Saturday, Feb. 2 at 9:30 a.m., 3:30 p.m. and 9:30 p.m. on Sirius XM Radio's POTUS (Politics of the United States) Channel 124. The episode will be posted on the "White House Chronicle" Web site, whchronicle.com, on Monday, Feb. 4.

Lastly, NBC's Reno, Nevada affiliate has covered the hunger strike: http://www.mynews4.com/news/local/story/Patients-fight-for-FDA-to-approve-drug-application/zuCxhkI0eUOiECmK_McvmA.cspx

Activist Rivka Solomon, a Boston-area playwright who has spent 23 years disabled by ME/CFS, much of it homebound and bedridden, states, "One million disabled Americans feel abandoned by their government for over two decades. They feel this can not continue and that they have no choice but to take extraordinary measures, such as a hunger strike, to get the help they need from the U.S. government. I support Robert Miller and other patients who are doing all they can to get us the medications we need to help us survive. We hope the FDA cares enough about its disabled citizens to approve Ampligen."

# # #

If you'd like more information about this topic, or to schedule an interview with Robert Miller, please call 703-554-5575 or email bobmiller42@msn.com

BOB MILLER'S HUNGER STRIKE

Advocate Bob Miller has been on a hunger strike to try to convince FDA to approve the experimental drug Ampligen for ME.  He and fellow patient Dr. Janet Smith got a terrific piece of local news coverage in Reno, Nevada. FDA is scheduled to make a decision on Ampligen's fate by tomorrow.  Given that the FDA committee voted no to Ampligen on December 20, odds are slim that the FDA will overturn its committee's decision, but it ain't over until it's over.

Bob Miller posted this on Facebook today:
"Patients who are able can call NBC News at 212-664-4444 and comment on the story [above]. Be sure to tell the person who answers why you are calling, they will put you through to a comment line where you can request for them to please cover this important news story nationally, be sure to tell them where you are calling from."

FDA'S DOUBLE STANDARD

A mad-as-hell Sid Wolfe of the watchdog group Public Citizen sued FDA about the agency's refusal to ban the highest dose of the Pfizer Alzheimer's drug Aricept--and lost. Studies don't show increased efficacy of the 23-milligram pill compared with the lower doses of 5 and 10 milligrams.  However, the higher dose does show increased toxicity, including, Wolfe said, increased mortality.

According to a comprehensive article by reporter Ed Silverman, the director of the FDA’s Division of Neurology Products, Rusty Katz, explained his reasoning for keeping the higher dose by posing a question and then answering it:  “Does the absence of a demonstration of any superiority of the 23 milligram dose to the 10 milligram dose on measures of overall functioning, coupled with the increased incidence of potentially significant adverse events, argue against the approval of this product?” The 23 milligram dose is “clearly superior to the 10 milligram dose” on a cognitive measure.* “In my view, this strongly argues for a conclusion that the 23 milligram dose is very likely to also have an effect on overall functioning, despite this not having been demonstrated directly in this study” [emphasis added].

Reporter Ed Silverman also wrote that given the few Alzheimer's treatments available, FDA believes that physicians may decide the added side effects justify the benefits. 

Following that logic, FDA, Ampligen's side effects are in most cases, minor or manageable, and given that there are no FDA-approved ME treatments, shouldn't Ampligen be approved?  Instead the FDA committee, while endorsing Ampligen's safety, voted that the drug didn't meet FDA's standards for efficacy--though it was "probably effective."  Probably effective sounds an awful lot like the "very likely" of two paragraphs up.

Why the double standard, FDA?  Could it be FDA is throwing the pharmaceutical giant a big bone because the patents on the lower doses are expiring?  Could it be that FDA believes Alzheimer's to be more important than ME?  Could it be, as Sid Wolfe suspects, that FDA doesn't want to admit it was wrong in approving the 23 milligram dose in the first place?

Sid Wolfe also testified at the FDA Ampligen hearing on December 20 that Ampligen shouldn't be approved either.  (And a patient I talked to at the meeting said she overheard him say that cognitive therapy works.) 

Here's Ed Silverman's story, if you want more info.

*In three of the four tests, there was no increase in cognitive function at the higher dose.

An Inappropriate Script

For me, the most problematic thing about the FDA Ampligen committee meeting wasn't Ampligen's nonapproval.  It was a sick ME patient leaning on a cane who showed me the prescription a neurologist had given her—after admonishing her for using a cane.  Gazing at the script for several seconds, I first felt confusion and then the patient's humiliation.  The prescription read:

Tai Chi  

I told this story to a friend who's had ME for more than 20 years, and he said in all seriousness:  At this point, I'd take that cane and bash the doctor's head with it.   

The Oxford Definition It's Baaack

I asked CDC's Unger via email why is CDC using the antiquated Oxford* definition in its partnership with HRSA (Health Resources and Services Administration), along with Fukuda** and Canadian Consensus Criteria*** in its continuing education courses? The Oxford definition requires only fatigue, unlike the other definitions of ME, which require immune, neurologic and autonomic symptoms.

I also asked Unger:

• For most CFS-literate physicians and patients, using all three definitions is a problem. That’s because the Oxford definition requires only fatigue as a symptom. In contrast, Fukuda requires fatigue and four other symptoms.* According to most CFS-literate physicians, the Canadian Consensus Criteria (CCC) is the most accurate and thorough of these three definitions, and requires the following: fatigue, post-exertional malaise and/or fatigue, sleep dysfunction, and pain; two or more neurological/cognitive manifestations and one or more symptoms from two of the categories of autonomic, neuroendocrine and immune manifestations.**

Given the significant differences in definitions, does CDC believe using all three definitions is problematic?  Why or why not?

• By focusing on fatigue, the Oxford definition neglects other important symptoms embraced by CCC, as well as other symptoms in the original Fukuda definition. Fatigue is characteristic of many illnesses, from cancer and heart disease to depression.  Thus, with the Oxford definition, CFS morphs into a vague disease—it’s only vague by the Oxford definition, not by CCC.  Using the Oxford definition makes it more difficult for doctors to distinguish pathological fatigue of CFS from ordinary fatigue and from illnesses that have fatigue as a symptom—and that’s most illnesses. For all these reasons, Oxford is, in the view of most patients and CFS-literate physicians, a woefully inadequate and inaccurate definition.  Does CDC understand the problems with the Oxford definition?

• Does CDC want there to be confusion about the disease?  

• If CDC doesn’t want there to be confusion, why does it use all three vastly different definitions in the HRSA CME courses?

• Over and over again, CDC states in meetings and in its medical articles that CFS is a poorly understood disease. Other researchers and clinicians look to CDC for guidance. Does CDC understand that by using all three of these vastly different definitions, CDC is causing the disease to be poorly understood?

• The CCC definition describes the illness that most patients and CFS-literate physicians understand to be CFS. Given that using multiple definitions results in confusion and heterogeneous populations, why not make this critical change and use only CCC? Please explain why CDC won’t do this.

CDC’s Response
Through its press office, CDC—I assume it was Unger, since I directed my questions to her—replied:

CDC has developed several CFS CME courses, including Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (see http://www.cdc.gov/cfs/education/diagnosis/index.html) which was prepared in collaboration with other CFS subject matter experts, including non-CDC clinicians in private practice and academic settings. Among other things, this CDC CME course provides information about multiple CFS case definitions, such as those mentioned in your query. CDC uses the 1994 case definition, but recognizes there are additional case definitions that can be useful. CDC is committed to providing accurate, evidence-based CFS information that is relevant to various audiences, including CFS patients, clinicians who treat CFS patients, researchers, and others.
 
I believe this information addresses the questions you asked.  You may wish to contact HRSA directly about questions regarding CME courses produced by that agency.
 
Thank you for your interest in CDC’s CFS research program.

This article is copyright CFS Central 2012. All Rights Reserved. You may quote up to 150 words from this article as long as you indicate in the body of your post (as opposed to a footnote or an endnote) that the excerpt is by Mindy Kitei for CFS Central. You may not reprint more than 150 words from this article on blogs, forums, websites or any other online or print venue. Instead, refer readers to this blog to read the article. 
 

------------------- 

*Oxford definition
fatigue as the main symptom; definite onset and not lifelong; fatigue is severe, disabling and affects physical and mental function; fatigue should persist for 6 months or more and be present 50% of the time; other symptoms, especially myalgia, sleep and mood disturbance may be present.

**Fukuda definition:
Patients must have four of the following:

Self-reported impairment in short term memory or concentration severe enough to cause substantial reduction in previous levels of occupational, educational, social, or personal activities; sore throat; tender cervical or axillary lymph nodes; muscle pain; multi-joint pain without swelling or redness; headaches of a new type, pattern or severity; unrefreshing sleep; post-exertional malaise (PEM) lasting more than 24 hours.


*** Canadian Consensus Criteria:
Neurological/Cognitive Manifestations: Two or more of the following: confusion, impairment of concentration and short-term memory consolidation, disorientation, difficulty within formation processing, categorizing and word retrieval, and perceptual and sensory disturbances—e.g., spatial instability and disorientation and inability to focus vision. Ataxia, muscle weakness and fasciculations are common. There may be overload phenomena: cognitive, sensory—e.g., photophobia and hypersensitivity to noise—and/or emotional overload, which may lead to crash periods and/or anxiety.

One or more symptoms from two of the categories of autonomic, neuroendocrine and immune manifestations:

Autonomic Manifestations: orthostatic intolerance neurally mediated hypotension (NMH), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), delayed postural hypotension; light-headedness; extreme pallor; nausea and irritable bowel syndrome; urinary frequency and bladder dysfunction; palpitations with or without cardiac arrhythmias; exertional dyspnea.

Neuroendocrine Manifestations:  loss of thermostatic stability—subnormal body temperature and marked diurnal fluctuation, sweating episodes, recurrent feelings of feverishness and cold extremities; intolerance of extremes of heat and cold; marked weight change—anorexia or abnormal appetite; loss of adaptability and worsening of symptoms with stress.

Immune Manifestations: tender lymph nodes, recurrent sore throat, recurrent flu-like symptoms, general malaise, new sensitivities to food, medications and/or chemicals.

CDC Toolkit: Despite Its Inaccuracies, CDC Won't Remove It

Last spring, members of the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Advisory Committee (CFSAC) ruled that they wanted the CDC Toolkit about "CFS" removed from the CDC website because it’s inaccurate and because it’s giving false information to millions of doctors about ME.  For instance, the Toolkit endorses Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Graduated Exercise Therapy (GET), which have been shown not only to be unhelpful with people with bona fide CFS but GET can actually be harmful.  That's because the hallmark of ME is post-exertional crashing.  The more you do, the worse that crashing generally is, and sometimes patients don't recover from those crashes.

Furthermore, the Toolkit states that there are no labs and diagnostic tests other than routine labwork to rule out other diseases that mimic ME, when in fact this is untrue. Many tests show abnormalities with ME patients.  For example, bona fide ME patients usually exhibit low natural killer function and abnormal tilt-table testing for autonomic dysfunction, and several published studies attest to these abnormalities.

At the CFSAC meeting this month, head of CFS research Dr. Beth Unger was asked by CFSAC member Steven Krafchick if the Toolkit was going to be taken down.  And Dr. Unger replied, “No.”

I emailed CDC a list of questions about the Toolkit, and below was the response.  Most problematic, CDC stated in its reply:  "The information in the Toolkit is not inaccurate, and we have verified this repeatedly in discussions with clinicians who care for CFS patients."

Given that the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Advisory Committee has made a strong recommendation to remove the Toolkit, and given that the Toolkit is inaccurate, why hasn’t it been removed? 

"CDC continually reviews and assesses the best way to present information. CDC has determined that the agency’s website is an appropriate channel for providing the CFS Toolkit information to patients, clinicians, other stakeholders, and the public. This information is also available in hard copy in the form of booklets. The information in the Toolkit is not inaccurate, and we have verified this repeatedly in discussions with clinicians who care for CFS patients.  We have plans to revise the presentation and clarify issues that have been identified by CFSAC member Eileen Holderman and Dr. Lily Chu. There still remains a need for basic introductory information about this illness for primary care physicians, including those serving Spanish-speaking populations. The Toolkit, in both its English and Spanish versions, serves this need."

Who at CDC is responsible for making the decision to keep the Toolkit?

 
"For most CDC websites, content decisions are reached through a collective understanding among various CDC professionals with expertise in scientific subject matter and the presentation of complex public health information. CDC also consults with clinicians and other interested individuals about the ongoing need for information about CFS and has been advised that the Toolkit helps meet this need. CDC will continue to work with others to review the Toolkit and update and expand this information as appropriate."

Why isn’t CDC listening to the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Advisory Committee?

 
"CDC does listen to the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Advisory Committee places great value in recommendations made by the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Advisory Committee. We consider all recommendations made by this committee. For example, the recent revision of the CFS website  was initiated in response to CFSAC recommendations.  CDC solicited specific comments from CFSAC members on the CFS web page and used these comments to make improvements to the site.  We are taking the same approach with the Toolkit." 

TELL THE FDA: What Have Your Experiences Been on Ampligen?

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will once again decide this winter whether the experimental drug Ampligen, which has helped many ME patients recover or improve, should be approved.  Should the drug be approved, it will be an ME game-changer. 

Oddly, little has been discussed on the boards about Ampligen this time around—perhaps because the drug’s been up for approval several times before—and that’s too bad, because an approved drug would help legitimize the disease, provide much-needed treatment for patients, and signal to other drug companies that the disease is worthy of effective medications—and not psychobabble.

Eighteen years ago, I wrote a piece on Ampligen for Philadelphia magazine called The AIDS Drug No One Can Have. Back then the drug proved remarkably helpful for both ME and HIV/AIDS.  Many patients went from bedridden to returning to work and school and a few with ME whom I interviewed who’d been ill for only a few years completely recovered. 

Then the FDA pushed for a change to make the intravenous drug easier to administer; it’s not clear if the new formulation is as effective, but many patients have continued to report improvement.

The FDA has tentatively scheduled the review process to begin December 20 and to continue to February 2. 

In the meantime, the FDA wants to hear from patients by November 1 about their experiences with ME, including how drugs like Ampligen have helped in treating the disease. The FDA is also interested in learning about the emblematic endpoints that should be used in reviewing ME drugs for approval. Fatigue, for instance, is a a subjective and often inaccurate marker with ME. Improvement in post-exertional malaise would be a far more significant marker. 

Patients can submit comments about Ampligen to the FDA directly here or send in comments and I'll post them on CFS Central and forward them to the FDA. Pressure needs to be placed on the government so that these agencies will be forced—kicking and screaming—to do the right thing by patients.

Team Science

 

Recently Dr. Dennis Mangan, retired NIH chair of the ME/CFS Research Working Group, penned a problematic piece with the convoluted title “Writing an NIH grant application—Team science: Playing in the same sandbox.”

Mangan delivered the news that ME deserves research. The anticipated “but” arrived in no time with the word “regrettably” as in “Regrettably, Congress is now talking about a decreased budget for non-defense related ‘discretionary’ expenses… such as NIH-supported medical research. The success rate for applications is likely to decrease. Opportunities for additional research on ME/CFS will be lost.”

Pass the potatoes. I should add that I once worked for a boss who couldn’t give me a raise but had a wastebasket worth $14,000.

Mangan went on to discuss how researchers working on a team science project should “know their collaborators,” get input in the early planning stages, decide who should be a “team leader,” and get “everyone fully committed to the project.” Who the hell is this piece for?  Children? You know, when my niece was about 5 years old, she saw a photo of the Backstreet Boys on the cover of my Entertainment Weekly. Pointing to their white T-shirts, she said shrewdly:  “Those boys are on the same team.”  

With what passes for wit in the government, Mangan drove home his point by including a lame T-shirt in his piece:

In a follow-up letter came Mangan's inevitable catch-22:  Until we have a "breakthrough" about ME, the government won't throw any meaningful money at it.

In my view, the only redeeming things about the Mangan missive were the brilliant, piercing letters by ME patient Matthew Lazell-Fairman and CFIDS Association board member Jennifer Spotila. In particular, Lazell-Fairman discussed the concept of “will”—or the lack of it, when it comes to the government’s longtime lip service to ME. 

In her letter, the CFIDS Association’s Kim McCleary hurled a bunch of statistics, always guaranteed to bore readers to death. I have no recollection of any of it, as I had to hold my head to keep it from exploding. Please stop doing this, Kim. See the forest through the trees.

A man I used to sleep next to had the bizarro habit of squirming uncontrollably before falling asleep, making it impossible for me to fall asleep. So we devised a code word for keeping still: “tomato.” And he’d remain blessedly still until I slipped into unconsciousness. I have no idea how we arrived at “tomato,” except that we both loved Jersey tomatoes (with coarse sea salt), so it conjured pleasant thoughts.

Maybe ME patients need a code word for “cut the crap,” when it comes to government mumbo jumbo. What should it be?

The Blood Became Sick

A disease discovered about eight years ago is spreading in Asia and parts of the United States. Its victims, most of whom are Asian, are HIV-negative. Their immune systems are paralyzed due to the body churning out autoantibodies that inhibit gamma interferon, which fights infections. For more:  click here.